Home   |   Intro   |   Overview   |   Topics   |   Links   |   FAQ   |   Email List   |   Donate   |   Blog   |   Contact
1.   Since the 9/11 Commission didn't get to the truth, isn't a new investigation necessary?
The 9/11 Commission was chartered to prepare a full and complete account of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. Many members of the commission, including the lead investigator, have now publicly stated that the investigation was compromised, lied to and did not get to the truth. Given this information, isn't a new investigation necessary?
2. Why wasn't there a complete forensic investigation of the crime scene?
Although ground zero was one of the largest crime scenes in history, the NIST report documents that explosives were never tested for. (p.xxxvi) This despite the numerous eyewitness accounts of explosions as well as audio and video evidence.
3.  How did WTC 7 smoothly collapse into its own footprint at free-fall speed?
If you were to ask the average person how many World Trade Center towers were destroyed on 9/11, they would most likely say two. However three skyscrapers were actually destroyed. Two planes hit two buildings and three fell down: The Twin Towers and World Trade Center 7.
In this video, recorded closer to the building, the initial low frequency explosions are audible.
4.  How do the media and others have foreknowledge of the collapse?
BBC News in London reported that WTC 7 (The Solomon Brothers Building) collapsed 20 minutes before it actually fell. They were giving the report live in New York and you can see the building in the background behind them! How is this possible unless they were reading from a script that had been given to them in advance? CNN also announced the building collapse ahead of time. Firefighters at the scene warned bystanders that the building was about to blow up. The owner of the building even went on PBS and announced that they ordered the building to be taken down! How can anyone believe the government's position that all this was caused by office fires?
Second video about molten steel.
Molten metal at ground zero.
Molten metal fused with concrete take from the debris.
NASA AVIRIS thermal image of ground zero on 9/16/01
Molten metal was present underneath the remains of all three world trade center towers. USGS aerial thermal imaging showed surface temperatures of over 800 degrees F five days after the attack. However, there were no fires at the surface. Aerial images were recording molten metal under the surface. There was even molten metal recorded flowing out of the towers before they came down, even though there was minimal fire.  How could a gravitational collapse have caused this molten metal? (mathematical gravitational analysis)
5.  How can a gravitational collapse melt steel and concrete?
Next Page (1 of 2)

John Farmer, Lead Investigator

Thomas Keen and Lee Hamilton. Chairman and Co-Chairman
The NFPA (National Fire Protection Association) 921 Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigations is the standard fire investigation manual in the US. The guidelines dictate that explosives be tested for in any crime scene where there is melted steel or concrete.
This building fell to the ground at freefall speed. Nearly all of the 82 massive steel support columns failed simultaneously. The internal structure offered no resistance to gravity. The building fell through the path of greatest resistance. How is this possible without the use of explosives?